phoenix dui lawyer dui lawyers in arizona dui lawyers tempe phoenix dui attorney criminal lawyers phoenix phoenix dui attorneys scottsdale dui lawyers dui laws in arizona

Arizona Abortion Law

Today David M Cantor, a Phoenix based criminal defense lawyer, does a follow up on last months video – AZ Abortion Bill HB 2443 solves problems we don’t have. Last week Governor Jan Brewer signed this bill into law.

After that happened David was contacted by Ellen Tumposky of ABC news.
In that interview David reiterated his prior point that this law has no basis in Arizona or US reality. The studies that were cited we from India and China.

A new aspect of this Bill that David brings up is the new malpractice issue raised. Abortions are very sensitive surgeries and many things can go wrong. Now a doctor will have to contend with even more libel therefore driving doctors away from this procedure strictly due to insurance issues.

This does not help to address any real issue where Women and Minorities are being injured by abortion, as the bills supporters claim. If that were really the motive then why are the same lawmakers taking away medical and education resources from children?

Aggravated DUI with Child in Car

Aggravated DUI with Child in Car:

If you are cited for any DUI while a child under the age of fifteen (15) was a passenger, you can also be charged with an Aggravated DUI (class six (6) felony). Although this type of DUI is not as serious as the standard class four (4) Aggravated DUI, it still is a felony. The State would need to prove not only that the child in the car was under fifteen (15) years of age, but that you were also either impaired by alcohol while driving, or you had a blood alcohol concentration of .08% or higher within two (2) hours of being stopped by the Officers.

For a first offense class six (6) felony, you can be sentenced anywhere from probation with one (1) to ninety (90) days in jail minimum (depending if you have a prior DUI or DWI conviction, and whether your blood alcohol content is above or below the Extreme DUI mark of .15%, or the Super Extreme mark of .20%) up to one (1) year in jail; and prison of four (4) months to two (2) years of incarceration. If the person has one (1) allegeable historical felony prior conviction, then the “prison only” range is nine (9) months to two and three quarters (2.75) years in prison. If the person has two (2) allegeable historical felony prior convictions, then the “prison only” range is two and one quarter (2.25) to five and three quarters (5.75) years of incarceration.

Additional Punishment for Aggravated DUI / DWI

In addition, to the above penalties, your license will be revoked for a minimum of three (3) years. When you do get your license back, then you will be required for at least one (1) year to place an interlock device (i.e., a breath testing device) on your steering wheel that you will have to blow into every time you start your car, and every fifteen (15) minutes after your car is running in order to keep the ignition from shutting off and the head lights from flashing. This will cost a minimum of $1500.00.

Possible Defenses for Aggravated DUI / DWI

There are many defenses to the Aggravated DUI and the Aggravated DWI charges. Don’t believe the Prosecutor – there are very few hopeless cases. The Aggravated DUI or the Aggravated DWI conviction has lifelong consequences, and-depending on the facts surrounding the individual case-Dismissal or Acquittal is Possible.

Below is a partial list of Possible Defenses for Aggravated DUI / DWI:

“No Reasonable Suspicion to Stop” Officers are not permitted to stop or detain someone based on pretexts regarding race, religion, gender, age, sexual preference nor on a host of other possible unjustifiable reasons.
Watch the following Video to hear how David M Cantor and his legal team handle the Arizona Aggravated DUI Defense for No Reasonable Suspicion to Stop:

“No Actual Physical Control” If a person has had too much to drink, pulls off the roadway, leaves the engine running with the A/C or heater on, and attempts to “sleep it off”, then they are not in “actual physical control” of their vehicle and are not guilty of DUI or DWI.
Watch the following Video to hear how David M Cantor and his legal team handle the Defense of Aggravated DUI for No Actual Physical Control:

“No Probable Cause for Arrest”If an officer did not have probable cause that a person was actually under the influence of alcohol, then the arrest will be invalidated (i.e. if the Field Sobriety Tests (FSTs) were improperly administered). The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has set forth guidelines regarding FSTs. The tests should not be given if the suspect:
is 50 pounds or more overweight
is 65 years of age or older
has any back, hip, leg, knee, or ankle injuries
has any disability effecting balance
is wearing shoes with heels two (2) inches or higher
Remember, you always have the right to refuse Field Sobriety Tests (i.e., the “physical” tests). Do not believe the Officer if he tells you otherwise!

If the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) or “eye test” was given by an officer not yet certified to give that test, it will be inadmissible in court.

Note: if the only basis for arrest is refusing to perform FSTs, then the arrest will be invalidated.

“Denial of Right to Counsel” When arrested for DUI or DWI, upon requesting a DUI/DWI Lawyer in Arizona, the police must get you to a phone as soon as it is reasonably possible. If they ignore your request, or wait too long, this could be grounds for dismissal. (See also THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT-USE IT! Section).
Watch the following video the hear how David M Cantor and his legal team handle the Arizona Aggravated DUI Defense for Denial of Right to Counsel:

“Inaccuracy of the Breath or Blood Testing Device” The AZ Department of Health Services (DHS) has set forth rules for the proper maintenance of breath testing devices. They must be calibrated to within a 10% accuracy range every thirty-one (31) days. In addition, the machine goes through a seven (7) test Standard Quality Assurance Procedure (SQAP) every ninety (90) days. If any of the maintenance checks are “out of tolerance”, then all breath tests given during the time interval between the two maintenance checks will be inadmissible. The prosecutor will not point this out for you.
Watch the following video to hear how David M Cantor and his legal team handle the Arizona Aggravated DUI Defense for Inaccuracy of the Breath or Blood Testing Device:

“Retrograde Extrapolation below .08% BAC at Time of Driving.” It can be shown through a math calculation that any alcohol drank in the last hour prior to being stopped would still be in your stomach and not in your blood system “at the time of driving”. For example, a one hundred and fifty (150) pound man who had a breath test of .15% an hour after he was stopped, yet he drank three beers in the last hour before leaving the bar, it can be shown that his BAC “at the time of driving” was as low as .075%. This number can go even lower due to other factors such as a ten percent variance and inaccurate blood to breath conversion ratios (i.e., “2100-1″) which are inherent to all breath testing devices. As of 7/17/00 the Legislature passed a law stating that this is only a defense to the DUI charge, not the DWI or the Extreme DWI charges. However, we will be challenging this change in the law as unconstitutional. This has already been successfully reversed in Delaware and Pennsylvania. We are continually challenging this law in the Appellate Courts. See us immediately to discuss the ongoing status of the “BAC at the time of driving” defense.
The “Common Defenses” for Aggravated DUI/DWI Felonies, which an Aggravated DUI/DWI Felony Lawyer may apply in any criminal case are numerous and diverse. One of most common defenses we encounter is a “Miranda rights Violation”. In Arizona, the standard of whether any inculpatory statement (i.e., a statement which tends to admit guilt) is admissible into evidence is based upon a “Voluntariness” standard. If we can demonstrate that the police coerced you (i.e., intimidated or tricked you) into making a confession or inculpatory statement, or that they did not properly read you your Miranda Rights, then we can suppress those statements and any evidence gathered as a direct result of those statements. In addition, “Denial of right to Counsel” is another common defense which is often raised. This occurs when a suspect is in custody and requests to speak to their Attorney, but is denied and questioning continues. Other defenses may include challenging the validity of any search warrant, or whether there were any “forensic flaws” during the investigation of your case. Depending on what you have been charged with, this could include exposing flawed procedures regarding blood, breath, and urine testing; fingerprints analysis; DNA testing; ballistics; gunshot residue testing; computer analysis/”cloning hard drive” procedures; forensic financial accounting reviews; etc. Lastly, one of the most common defenses is exposing sloppy or misleading police reports which include everything from misstatements, false statements, flawed photo line-ups and inaccurate crime scene reconstruction. It is important to hire a skilled Aggravated DUI/DWI Felony Lawyer to defend you who has knowledge of both the specific defenses and the common defenses involved in an Aggravated DUI/DWI Felony case.

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN Aggravated DUI & DWI

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN Aggravated DUI & DWI


Both DUI and DWI charges are equally serious and carry matching punishments. Arizona usually files two charges:

AGGRAVATED DUI (A.R.S. §1328-1383 applying A.R.S. §1328-1381 (A)(1)) Driving Under the Influence of intoxicating liquor (or drugs) while license suspended or third DUI / DWI within seven (7) years.
AGGRAVATED DWI (A.R.S. §1328-1383 applying A.R.S. §1328-1381 (A)(2)) Driving with a Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) of 0.08% or greater within two hours of driving while license suspended or third DUI / DWI within seven (7) years.
The key to defending against the charges is knowing the difference between these two.

The DUI charge, by itself, does not require a breath reading. It deals with suspicion of driving while under the influence, according to the manner of driving, physical and mental symptoms of impairment, or verbal admissions.

The DWI charge does not require that the accused have a BAC of .08% or greater “at the time of driving”. Many defendants plead guilty if their breath or blood test is above a .08%. The ordinary citizen does not realize the test results only show their BAC at the time they were tested and NOT at the time they were actually behind the wheel. As it will be explained in the “Possible Defenses” section, there is a way to mathematically calculate what your true BAC level was “at the time of driving”. This math formula is known as a “retrograde extrapolation”. If your BAC is found to be below a .08% “at the time of driving”, this is a possible defense.

Legal Update

As of 7/17/00 the Legislature passed a law stating that the “retrograde extrapolation” is only a defense to the DUI charge, not the DWI or the Extreme DWI charges. However, we are continually challenging this change in the law as unconstitutional. This has already been successfully reversed in Delaware and Pennsylvania. Many DUI/DWI Lawyers in Arizona are currently challenging this law in the Appellate Courts. See us immediately to discuss the ongoing status of the “BAC at the time of driving” defense.

By citing drivers under two laws, Aggravated DUI (A.R.S. §28-1383 (A)(1)), and Aggravated DWI (A.R.S. §28-1383(A)(2)), the State gets multiple chances to convict. If convicted of one or both Aggravated DUI or Aggravated DWI, the punishment is the same.


Possible Punishments/Penalties for Aggravated DUI/DWI


First offense felony:

The mandatory minimum penalty is four (4) months in PRISON; mandatory alcohol screening and classes; the MVD will revoke driving privileges for at least three (3) years; and supervised probation requiring monthly visits, monthly probation fees, and urinalysis at any time the probation officer so desires. The maximum can be three and three quarters (3.75) years in PRISON!

Second offense felony:

If convicted of a second felony Aggravated DUI or Aggravated DWI during any time in your life (or if you have one (1) allegeable historical non-Aggravated DUI felony conviction), you will be subject to a mandatory minimum two and one quarter (2.25) years in PRISON along with the other penalties outlined above. The maximum can be seven and one half (7.5) years in PRISON!

Third offense felony or more:

If convicted of a second felony Aggravated DUI or Aggravated DWI during any time in your life (or if you have two (2) allegeable historical non-Aggravated DUI felony conviction), you will be subject to a mandatory minimum six (6) years in PRISON along with the other penalties outlined above. The maximum can be fifteen (15) years in PRISON!


 http://dmcantor.com/dui-vehicular-crimes/aggravated-dui-dwi-felonies

Possible Punishment/Penalties for Extreme DUI and Super Extreme DUI

Possible Punishment/Penalties for Extreme DUI and Super Extreme DUI


First offense misdemeanor:

Extreme DWI – (.15% and above BAC)

First offense mandatory minimum 30 days jail and no days can be suspended* (this means you must serve all 30 days in jail – day for day)
Pay a $2500.00 fine
Must attend alcohol classes
One (1) year of an IID being attached to your steering wheel after all license suspensions are completed (at a cost of $1500)*#.
Once you start your car, you must then continue to blow into the device every 15 minutes to keep your car’s ignition on!
Lastly, a judge may order a person convicted of Extreme DWI not to consume alcohol for a period of thirty days or more by requiring them to wear a continuous alcohol monitoring device on their ankle, or blowing twice daily into a telephonic breath testing device.
The court, in its discretion, may also extend this period of continuous alcohol monitoring.
Super Extreme DWI – (.20% and above BAC)

First offense mandatory minimum 45 days in jail and no days can be suspended*. This means you must serve all 45 days in jail-day-for-day!
You will also receive a $2750.00 fine
Must attend alcohol classes (presumably at least 36)
Eighteen (18) months of an IID being attached to your steering wheel after all suspensions are completed at a cost of over $2000.00.
Lastly, the judge can order you to not consume alcohol for a period of ninety (90) days or more and require you to wear a continuous alcohol monitoring device on your ankle, or blow into a telephonic breath testing device twice a day.
Second offense misdemeanor:

Extreme DWI – (.15% and above BAC with a prior DUI conviction within seven (7) years from this offense):

Mandatory minimum one hundred and twenty (120) days jail and no days can be suspended
Fine of approximately $3250.00 fine
Must attend alcohol classes
30 hours of community service
One (1) year of license revocation
Eighteen (18) months of a mandatory IID being attached to your steering wheel after all suspensions completed at a cost of $2000.00.
Super Extreme DWI – (.20% and above BAC with any prior DUI conviction within seven (7) years from this offense):

Mandatory minimum one-hundred eighty (180) days jail and no days can be suspended
Fine of approximately $3750.00
Alcohol classes (at least 36 hours)
One (1) year of license revocation
30 hours of community service
Two (2) years of an IID attached to your steering wheel after all suspensions are completed at a cost of $3000.00.

http://dmcantor.com/dui-vehicular-crimes/arizona-extreme-dui-laws-and-penalties

psychiatrist James Holmes reported warned University of Colorado police movie theater shooting

The psychiatrist for James Holmes is reported to have warned University of Colorado police six weeks before his movie theater shooting rampage in Aurora Colorado. Lynne Fenton, Holmes’ psychiatrist, told a police officer on campus that she was concerned that her paitent might be a danger to himself or others. It is not clear what the officer did with that information.

If this is true it marks the second instance where Fenton warned officials about her patients health and safety. It also marks the second time that nothing appears to have been done in response.

Holmes was a doctorate student in the University of Colorado Neuroscience program. He failed an oral examination on June 7th and dropped out of school on June 10th, six weeks before entering a midnight showing of ‘The Dark Knight’ and shooting 70 people, killing 12. He is charged with 24 counts of first-degree murder and 116 counts of attempted murder. If found guilty he may possibly face the death penalty.

The death penalty was reinstated in Colorado in 1975 but has only been used once since. In 1997 Gary Lee Davis was put to death via lethal injection after he was found guilty of murder and rape in 1986.

Insurance – Additional Punishment for DUI, DWI, Extreme DUI

Insurance – Additional Punishment for DUI, DWI, Extreme DUI

Until DUI, DWI, or Extreme DUI guilt is established, an insurance company should not–although some do–cancel your insurance coverage. If convicted of a DUI, DWI, or Extreme DUI, you will either be unable to get insurance coverage or you will pay roughly $3000 or more a year, for the next three (3) years, above your current rate.

Some Final Realities on DUI, DWI, Extreme DUI

DUI also includes driving under the influence of drugs. DUI, DWI, & Extreme DUI charges are filed thousands of times in Arizona every year against people from all walks of life. These charges are serious, but defensible, with assistance from a DUI Lawyer in Arizona experienced in DUI, DWI, & Extreme DUI law.

Click here… if you have not been charged yet, but the police are in the “pre-charge investigation stage” of your case.

It is important to hire an AV® rated law firm (the highest possible rating by Martindale Hubbell®). Also, David Michael Cantor is a skilled DUI Lawyer in Arizona, and a Certified Criminal Law Specialist, per the Arizona Board of Legal Specialization. In addition, the Firm and all of its DUI Lawyers in Arizona are listed in the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers®. At the Law Offices of David Michael Cantor, P.C., the majority of our Attorneys are ex-Prosecutors, and all of our DUI Lawyers in Arizona know the system well. For a free initial consultation, call us at 1-888-822-6867, or click here to contact us now.

Contact The Law Offices of David Michael Cantor and speak to a DUI Lawyers in Arizona. We will assist you with your DUI, DWI or Extreme DUI case.

 http://dmcantor.com/dui-vehicular-crimes/dui-dwi

Blood and Urine Cases

If your case involved the taking of blood or urine during your DUI arrest, you will need to wait and see if your results come back above or below a .08%. It usually takes anywhere between one (1) and six (6) months to get your results back. If your blood results are above a .08% the officer will forward a request for suspension to the DMV office. The DMV office will then notify you with a “Corrective Action Notice” (i.e., notice of suspension). The moment you receive this from the DMV, contact us immediately so we can request a hearing on your behalf. This request needs to be done within fifteen (15) days of the date of that suspension notice. What can be confusing is that the Corrective Action Notice will state that the suspension will not go into effect until twenty (20) days after mailing of the notice. Do not let them fool you with this extra five (5) days; you must request a hearing within the fifteen (15) day period. If you are stopped by an officer after we have requested a hearing, you will not have a yellow copy of a temporary driver’s license in your possession. His computer should reveal that we have requested a hearing on your behalf. If he still writes you a ticket for driving on a suspended license, do not panic. Simply bring it to us and we will take care of it. If he arrests you for driving on a suspended license, you can sue the DMV for not imputing the hearing request into the computer (assuming you were not already suspended prior to your DUI, DWI, or Extreme DUI arrest).

Prior to the actual DMV hearing, if you have retained the Law Offices of David Michael Cantor, P.C., we will have you in for a “Pre-DMV consultation”. At this consultation, we will go over the police report with you in detail and discuss whether it will be necessary for you to appear at the hearing or not. We will also discuss various options regarding whether to “Void” the suspension, or whether to actually “Stipulate” to the suspension in order to receive a “Work Permit”. This will also have ramifications nullifying any potential future suspension with regards to the first offense situations which could result from the criminal case. All of this will have to be discussed one-on-one with a DUI Lawyer in Arizona in our office.

DEALING WITH THE DMV


Overview

Since DUI and DWI’s involve driving, the Department of Motor Vehicles also plays a role in your case. In addition to the judge in your criminal case issuing an order to suspend or revoke your driver’s license as part of your punishment, upon a report from the police department after your arrest on a DWI/DUI charge, the DMV automatically suspends your license for 90 days upon a BAC of .08% or higher in blood or breath testing, or for a year upon an arrestee’s refusal to consent to the testing. However, you may challenge this suspension if you meet the required criteria.
Breath Test and Refusal Cases:

The decision of whether one should consent to a breath test, or refuse and accept the consequences is very fact-based and depends on the individual circumstances of the case. However, here are some very general guidelines. But remember, ask to call and talk with a DUI lawyer in Arizona at the Law Offices of David Michael Cantor, P.C., BEFORE making this decision.

In most first offense circumstances, it is wise to consent to a blood, breath, or urine test to determine your BAC after an arrest for DUI or DWI because refusal to consent results in one (1) year suspension of your driving privileges. In contrast, a breath test that comes back at a .08% or higher results in only an automatic ninety (90) day suspension, and a restricted driver’s license is possible.
If you have previously been convicted of a DUI/DWI within seven (7) years, it is wise not to consent to the test. Upon conviction for the second offense, you would have to serve a mandatory thirty (30) days or more in jail and will lose your license for one (1) year anyway. Thus, rather than risk the jail-time, it is wise to refuse to consent. But note: if you have previously refused to consent to a test, you will lose your driving privileges for two (2) years if you refuse to consent a second time.
If you do refuse, the officer can phone a magistrate in order to secure a “telephonic search warrant”. Once they receive this document, the officer will show it to you. At this point, if you do not cooperate in giving blood, the officers have the authority to hold you down and forcibly take the blood. Regardless of whether you have previously refused, it is always wise to agree to give blood once you are actually shown the search warrant. If you do physically resist, you can be cited with Obstruction of Justice, Aggravated Assault on an officer, Interfering with Judicial Proceedings, and numerous other charges.
WARNING: If you are currently required to have an Interlock Device on your car and you refuse to give a blood, breath or urine sample to an officer, then you can be charged with a Felony Aggravated DUI, under A.R.S. §28-1383 Additionally, a refusal to submit to a chemical test now carries a civil penalty of $500.00!
Remember, ask to call and talk with a DUI Lawyer in Arizona BEFORE making this decision.
Legal Update on DUI, DWI, Extreme DUI

As of August 12, 2005 a refusal to submit to a chemical test now carries a civil penalty of $500.00!
Legal Update on DUI, DWI, Extreme DUI

As of February 1, 2006 in certain situations, it will be possible to obtain a “work permit” to drive to and from work, school, or alcohol classes if you were suspended for refusing a chemical test (i.e., an “implied consent” suspension).

A document called the Administrative Per SE/ Implied Consent Affidavit usually is issued to the driver when the results of the BAC test is .08% or higher, or if you refused to submit to the test. The document consists of a pink and yellow piece of paper. A request for a hearing must be made within fifteen (15) days from the time the Affidavit was served. This is accomplished by filing out the back of the pink sheet and sending it to the DMV address on the upper left hand of the front side. If you retain the Law Offices of David Michael Cantor, P.C., then we will immediately file an official “Request for Hearing” pleading on your behalf. If this is not done, then on the 16th day the ninety (90) day suspension will immediately go into effect if you were above a .08%, or a one (1) year suspension if there was a refusal to submit to a blood, breath or urine test.

If the request for hearing is made within the fifteen (15) days, a “Hearing Date Notice” will usually be mailed out two (2) months later. The actual Hearing Date will be a month after receiving the Hearing Date Notice. During this two (2) to three (3) month time span, your license is valid and you are allowed to drive (assuming it was valid before the DUI stop). You will have the yellow copy in your possession which will serve as your “Temporary License”. If you are stopped by an officer during that period of time and he informs you that your license is suspended, simply tell him that we are your DUI Lawyers in Arizona and we have requested a hearing on your behalf. If he still cites you for driving on a suspended license, don’t panic. Simply bring in the ticket and we will take care of it. If he arrests you for driving on a suspended license, you can sue him for false arrest.

Prior to the actual DMV hearing, if you have retained the Law Offices of David Michael Cantor, P.C., we will have you in for a “Pre-DMV consultation”. At this consultation, we will go over the police report with you in detail and discuss whether it will be necessary for you to appear at the hearing. We will also discuss various options regarding whether to “Void” the suspension, or whether to actually “Stipulate” to the suspension in order to receive a “Work Permit”. This will also have ramifications nullifying any potential future suspension which could result from the criminal case. All of this will have to be discussed one-on-one with a DUI Lawyer in Arizona in our office.

 http://dmcantor.com/dui-vehicular-crimes/dui-dwi

Possible Defenses for DUI and DWI


Possible Defenses for DUI, DWI


There are many defenses to DUI, DWI, charges. Don’t believe the prosecutor; there are very few hopeless cases. A DUI or DWI conviction has lifelong consequences, and depending on the facts surrounding the individual case, a dismissal or acquittal is possible.
Below is a partial list of Possible Defenses for DUI, DWI, or Extreme DUI:
“No Reasonable Suspicion to Stop” Officers are not permitted to stop or detain someone based on pretexts regarding race, religion, gender, age, sexual preference nor on a host of other possibly discriminatory or legally insufficient reasons. Watch the following video to learn how David M. Cantor and his legal team handle the Arizona DUI Defense for No Reasonable Suspicion to Stop:

“No Actual Physical Control” If a person has had too much to drink, pulls off the roadway, leaves the engine running with the A/C or heater on, and attempts to “sleep it off”, they are not in “actual physical control” of their vehicle and are not guilty of DUI or DWI. Watch the following video to hear how David M. Cantor and his legal team handle the Arizona DUI Defense for No Actual Physical Control:

“No Probable Cause for Arrest” If an officer did not have probable cause that a person was actually under the influence of alcohol, then the arrest will be invalidated (i.e. if the Field Sobriety Tests ((FSTs)) were improperly administered). The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has set forth guidelines regarding FSTs. The tests should not be given if the suspect:
is 50 pounds or more overweight
is 65 years of age or older
has any back, hip, leg, knee, or ankle injuries
has any disability effecting balance
is wearing shoes with heels two (2) inches or higher

Remember, you always have the right to refuse Field Sobriety Tests (i.e., the “physical” tests). Do not believe the Officer if he tells you otherwise!

If the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) or “eye test” was given by an officer not yet certified to give that test, it will be inadmissible in court.

Note: if the only basis for arrest is refusing to perform FSTs, then the arrest will be invalidated.
“Denial of Right to Counsel” When arrested for DUI, DWI, or Extreme DUI, upon requesting a DUI Lawyer in Arizona, the police must get you to a phone as soon as it is reasonably possible. If they ignore your request, or wait too long, this could be grounds for dismissal. (See also THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT-USE IT! Section). Watch the following video to hear how David M Cantor and his legal team handle the Arizona DUI Defense for Denial of Right to Council:

“Inaccuracy of the Breath or Blood Testing Device” The AZ Department of Health Services (DHS) has set forth rules for the proper maintenance of breath testing devices. They must be calibrated to within a 10% accuracy range every thirty-one (31) days. In addition, the machine goes through a seven (7) test Standard Quality Assurance Procedure (SQAP) every ninety (90) days. If any of the maintenance checks are “out of tolerance”, then all breath tests given during the time interval between the two maintenance checks will be inadmissible. The prosecutor will not point this out for you. Watch the following video to hear how David M. Cantor and his legal team handle the Arizona DUI Defense for Inaccuracy of the Breath or Blood Testing Device:



“Retrograde Extrapolation below .08% BAC at Time of Driving” (Or below .15% If Extreme DWI). It can be shown through a math calculation that any alcohol drank in the last hour prior to being stopped would still be in your stomach and not in your blood system “at the time of driving”. For example, a one hundred and fifty (150) pound man who had a breath test of .15% an hour after he was stopped, yet he drank three beers in the last hour before leaving the bar, it can be shown that his BAC “at the time of driving” was as low as .075%. This number can go even lower due to other factors such as a ten percent variance and inaccurate blood to breath conversion ratios (i.e., “2100-1″) which are inherent to all breath testing devices. As of 7/17/00 the Legislature passed a law stating that this is only a defense to the DUI charge, not the DWI or the Extreme DWI charges. However, we will be challenging this change in the law as unconstitutional. This has already been successfully reversed in Delaware and Pennsylvania. We are currently challenging this law in the Appellate Courts. See us immediately to discuss the ongoing status of the “BAC at the time of driving” defense.
Additionally, because our law firm fights conviction from all angles, we would assert a wide range of defenses and challenges to constitutional violations that apply in all criminal cases. The possibilities are numerous and diverse. One of those we frequently assert is a “Miranda rights violation.” In Arizona, the standard of whether an incriminating statement (i.e., a statement which tends to admit guilt) is admissible into evidence is based upon a “voluntariness” standard. If we can demonstrate that the police coerced you (i.e., intimidated or tricked you) into making a confession or inculpatory statement, or that they did not properly read you your Miranda Rights, then we can suppress those statements and any evidence gathered as a direct result of those statements. In addition, the “denial of right to counsel” is another common defense which is often raised. When arrested for DUI, DWI, or Extreme DUI, upon requesting a DUI lawyer in Arizona, the police must get you to a phone as soon as it is reasonably possible. If they ignore your request, or wait too long, this could be grounds for dismissal. (See also THE RIGHT TO REMAIN SILENT-USE IT! Section.) Watch the following video to hear how David M. Cantor and his legal team handle the Arizona DUI Defense for Denial of Right to Counsel. Lastly, one of the most common defense tools is exposing sloppy or misleading police reports which include everything from misstatements, false statements, flawed photo line-ups and inaccurate crime scene reconstruction.

http://dmcantor.com/dui-vehicular-crimes/dui-dwi

Possible Punishment/Penalties for DUI and DWI


First offense misdemeanor:

Regular DUI or DWI – The penalties for a first conviction of non-extreme DUI or DWI are: a mandatory minimum of 10 days in jail – 9 days can be suspended only upon completion of mandatory attendance at alcohol screening (approximately $200); any recommended classes (approximately $400); and a minimum fine and surcharge of approximately $1250.00. The maximum can be six (6) months’ jail. In addition, the court now must order one (1) year of a mandatory IID being attached to your steering wheel, which requires you to blow into the device every time you start your car. In addition, you must then continue to blow into the device every 15 minutes to keep your car’s ignition on! Lastly, if the court chooses, they can order “more than twelve months” of an interlock device in severe cases.
Second offense misdemeanor:

Regular DUI or DWI – A conviction for a second non-extreme DUI or DWI within seven (7) years from the first conviction, the mandatory minimum penalties are: at least 90 days in jail-60 days can be suspended only upon completion of the mandatory alcohol screening classes outlined above; a minimum fine and surcharge of approximately $3000.00; 30 hours community service; the Motor Vehicle Department (MVD) will revoke your driving privileges for at least one (1) year; and one (1) year of a mandatory IID being attached to your steering wheel after all suspensions completed at a cost of $1500.
Third offense misdemeanor:

The prosecutor has the option of charging a third offense misdemeanor as a first offense felony, Aggravated DUI. . . and they usually do!
DUI Drugs:

Per A.R.S. §28-1381 (A)(3), it is illegal to drive with a metabolite of illegal or illicit drugs in a person’s body. “Illegal” drugs are the common drugs that we all know (cocaine, marijuana, etc.) that are usually illegal for everyone to use. An “illicit” drug is a legal prescription drug that is possessed by somebody who does not have a valid prescription to consume or possess those drugs. Under this statute, it is irrelevant whether or not you are impaired by the drug while driving, and it is a “strict liability” crime to merely have those metabolites in your system. This means that you could have smoked marijuana thirty (30) days prior to driving, and still be pulled over and cited for DUI Drugs. However, the police officer still needs to have “reasonable suspicion” and “probable cause” in order to pull you over or force you to provide a blood, breath or urine test. This will be explained more thoroughly in the “Possible Defenses” section.


http://dmcantor.com/dui-vehicular-crimes/dui-dwi

The Difference DUI and DWI


The Difference Between DUI & DWI


Both DUI and DWI charges are equally serious and carry matching punishments. Extreme DUI and Super Extreme DUI, however, carry more severe penalties. Arizona usually files two or three charges against you:
DUI (A.R.S. §28-1381 (A)(1)) Driving Under the Influence of intoxicating liquor (or drugs).
DWI (A.R.S. §28-1381 (A)(2)) Driving with a Blood Alcohol Content (BAC) of 0.08% or greater within two hours of driving.

If your BAC was 0.15% or higher then you have an Extreme DUI which you can learn more about here.

The DUI charge, by itself, does not require a breath reading. It deals with suspicion of driving while under the influence, according to the manner of driving, physical and mental symptoms of impairment, or verbal admissions.

The DWI charge does require a breath reading, but it does not require that the accused have a BAC of .08% or greater “at the time of driving”. It prohibits anyone from having a BAC of .08% or higher within 2 hours of driving if the alcohol was consumed during, or before, driving the car.
Legal Update on DUI, DWI, Extreme DUI

On January 1, 2012, a new piece of legislation, AZ1200, will take effect that will dramatically change the rights of persons charged with DUI/DWI violations and the potential punishments that they face. Some of these changes will be good for persons facing these types of charges; however, some of these changes will also be very detrimental to the rights of these persons. The most troublesome change in the law is that a person charged with a first-time, non-extreme DUI/DWI charge under 1381(A)(1) or (2) will no longer have a right to a trial by jury. Instead, the judge will decide guilt or innocence on this charge, rather than a jury of your peers. Another change is that a person arrested for DUI and has a drug in their body which is illegal, or to which they are not prescribed, will now receive a license suspension.
Some good things will also come out of this legislation. The judge will be allowed to suspend all but nine (9) days on Extreme DUI conviction, and all but fourteen (14) days on a Super Extreme DUI conviction, of a sentence if the defendant equips his car with an Ignition Interlock Device (IID) for twelve (12) months. The new law also eliminates a refusal to consent to BAC testing while required to maintain an IID from the definition of Aggravated DUI. It also grants the authority to sheriffs, cities, and towns and to establish their own continuous alcohol monitoring programs as an alternative to incarceration for individuals convicted of DUI/DWI offenses. It also allows the Arizona Department of Corrections Director the flexibility to establish a program to release certain prisoners who have been convicted of driving under the influence offenses. The law also reduces the amount of time required for an IID for a first-time, non-extreme DUI offender to six (6) months if certain requirements are met. The law reduces the amount of time an Aggravated DUI offender’s license is revoked down to one (1) year, but increases the possible IID time to twenty-four (24) months.

 http://dmcantor.com/dui-vehicular-crimes/dui-dwi

Experienced Phoenix DUI Lawyers who are Beyond Aggressive


Experienced Phoenix DUI Lawyers who are Beyond Aggressive

The Cantor Defense Team is highly versed in all areas of vehicular criminal law, including felony and misdemeanor charges of DUI, DWI, vehicular manslaughter, aggressive driving, reckless driving, unlawful flight from police, hit and run, and other vehicular-related crimes. Almost every attorney on our DUI and Vehicular Crimes Defense Team is a former prosecutor. In fact, the law offices of David Michael Cantor, P.C., have included former prosecutors from the following jurisdictions: the State of Arizona Attorney General’s office, the City of Phoenix prosecutor’s office, the City of Mesa prosecutor’s office, the City of Glendale prosecutor’s office, the City of Goodyear prosecutor’s office, the Maricopa County Attorney’s office, and the U.S. Attorney’s office.

WE TAKE PRIDE IN KNOWING MORE ABOUT MATTERS OF DUI DEFENSE THAN THE PROSECUTION AND POLICE OFFICERS!

If there is any defense to a criminal allegation of a Vehicular or DUI-related crime, the experienced DUI Attorneys in Phoenix, Arizona on the Cantor Criminal Defense Team will find it and utilize it to your benefit. The Cantor DUI Criminal Defense Team, along with the numerous expert witnesses at their disposal, can give you your best chance for a complete acquittal or reduction of the charges.

Our Criminal Defense Team of Phoenix DUI Attorneys in Arizona is very knowledgeable in all areas of forensic sciences, including breath and urine alcohol testing methods; blood testing; gas chromatography and infrared mass-spectrometry. We use every available scientific method to give you an advantage in the courts.

It is important to hire an AV® rated law firm (the highest possible rating by Martindale Hubbell®). Also David Michael Cantor is a Certified Criminal Law Specialist, per the Arizona Board of Legal Specialization. In addition, the Firm and all of its lawyers are listed in the Bar Register of Preeminent Lawyers®. At the Law Offices of David Michael Cantor, P.C., the majority of our Attorneys are ex-Prosecutors, and all of our Phoenix DUI Attorneys in Arizona know the system well. For a free initial consultation, call us at 1-888-822-6867, orclick here to contact us now.

The experienced DUI Lawyers in Phoenix, at the Law Office of David Michael Cantor handle criminal DUI and vehicular crime defense cases in Phoenix, Scottsdale, Mesa, Tempe, Glendale, Goodyear, Chandler, Gilbert, Fountain Hills, Buckeye, Avondale, Paradise Valley, Peoria, Surprise, Sun City, El Mirage and all courts in the Phoenix metro area and throughout the State of Arizona.

Contact The Law Offices of David Michael Cantor and speak to a DUI Attorney in Arizonaabout your case. We handle Phoenix DUI/ DWI cases, vehicular crimes, homicide, drug and sex offenses, white collar crimes, property crimes and other violent crimes.



http://dmcantor.com/dui-vehicular-crimes

As a DUI lawyer, what would YOU do if you were stopped for DUI?

As a DUI lawyer, what would YOU do if you were stopped for DUI?
1. Immediately request an attorney -- Ask officer to note time of my request.
2. Refuse to answer ANY questions (Other than name and address).
3. Produce requested documents ... be polite even if the officer isn’t.
4. Refuse ALL field sobriety tests.
5. If you refuse a request for a breath, blood or urine test, your license will be suspended for a year and law enforcement can, and will, obtain a search warrant from a judge to take your blood, so we do not generally recommend refusing this test. That is not the same for a portable breath test (i.e., at the scene) as this is not a test that can be used to take your license for one year for a refusal.
I have some questions about my DUI case. Where can I go for answers?
Our firm offers a FREE, no-obligation initial consultation.

What defenses are there in a DUI case?

What defenses are there in a DUI case?

Potential defenses in a given drunk driving case are almost limitless due to the complexities of the offense. Roughly speaking, however, the majority can be broken down into the following areas:
1. Lack of Driving or Actual Physical Control. Intoxication is not enough: the prosecution must also prove that the defendant was driving or in actual physical control of a vehicle while impaired to the slightest degree for reason of alcohol consumption or with a BAC of .10 or more within two hours of driving. This may be difficult if, as in the case of accidents, there are no witnesses to his or her being the driver of the vehicle.

2. Lack of Reasonable Suspicion to Stop or Probable Cause to Arrest. Evidence will be suppressed if the officer did not have legal cause to (a) stop, (b) detain, and (c) arrest. Sobriety roadblocks present particularly complex issues.
3. Miranda. Incriminating statements may be suppressed if warnings were not given at the appropriate time.

4. Deficient "Implied Consent" warnings. If the officer did not advise you of the consequences of refusing to take a chemical test, or gave the prescribed instructions incorrectly, this may affect admissibility of the test results -- as well as the license suspension imposed by the motor vehicle department.

5. Subjective Nature of the Offense/Erroneous Nature of the Evidence. Most crimes involve tangible evidence -- a quantity of illegal drugs, a body, a gun, a knife, etc. An alleged violation of 28-1381(A)(1), Driving while impaired to the slightest degree, relies almost exclusively on the subjective and unverifiable impressions of the arresting officer. The officer's observations and opinions as to impairment can be questioned. The circumstances and procedures of the Field Sobriety Tests can also be called into question. The strong tendency of the police officer to reinforce his arrest decision with "facts" conveniently corroborative of that decision can be attacked. Also, DUI arrests translate to thousands of overtime dollars for the involved officers. This fact is relevant to a motive on the part of the officer to err on the side of arrest in close cases and should be brought to the jury’s attention. Furthermore, an alleged violation of 28-1381(A)(2), having an unlawful BAC within two hours of driving, will also rely an test results that are highly questionable. A breath test has one compelling -- and erroneous -- assumption: That all test subjects are "average." The only truly "average" person is a woman, Chinese and dead

6. Blood-alcohol concentration. There exists a wide range of potential problems with blood, breath or urine testing.
A. Inherent Margin of Error. The Intoxilyzer 5000 has an acknowledged 10% margin of error -- that is a twenty percent range of error. In other words, on its best day, when the device is calibrated and deemed to be operating properly, it will have a 10% +/- margin of error.

B. Core Body Temperature Variation. The Intoxilyzer 5000 assumes that every test subject has a core body temperature of 37 degrees C. and an expired breath temperature of 34 degees C. For each degree above this assumed average, test results will be 6.8% higher than the subject’s actual blood alcohol level as measured by the breath reading. This problem tends to be exaggerated by the circadian effect -- the later after rising that one is tested, the higher their core body temperature will be. Given that most DUI arrests occur after midnight, this is a substantial factor. State witnesses will be forced to admit they don’t have the slightest idea of what a given test subject’s body temperature might have been at the time of the test.

C. Non-specific and Cumulative Analysis. The Intoxilyzer 5000 is an Infrared Spectrophotometer utilizing a process which measures the methyl "tail" of any hydro-carbon molecule detectable at the 3.39 to 3.48 infrared micron wavelength or "stretch". The device is NOT specific for ethyl alcohol. There are hundreds of these hydro-carbon compounds on the breath of an alcohol free subject. Not only does the machine not differentiate between these compounds, it reads them cumulatively as ethyl alcohol.

D. Partition Ratio Variation. As mentioned earlier, the Intoxilyzer 5000 assumes a 2100-to-1 ratio in converting alcohol in the breath to alcohol in the blood. As in the case of core body temperature, the machine assumes that all test subjects are "average." In fact, this ratio varies widely from person to person (and within a person from one moment to another). By way of illustration, if a person blows a .10 test result, and that person’s actual partition ratio at the time of testing is 1500-to-1 rather than the presumed 2100-to-1, their actual blood alcohol level will be closer to .06 -- a level below the legal limit.
State "experts" will argue that, given the so called "breath standard" of "1 gram of alcohol per 210 liters of breath," the partition ratio is "irrelevant" because the state need no longer prove blood alcohol content of "1 gram of alcohol per 100 liters of blood." This argument can be easily attacked because alcohol on the breath can not impair a person. Alcohol can only impair a person after it reaches the central nervous system through the blood. Accordingly, with respect to the issue of impairment, breath alcohol is only "relevant" to the extent that it purports to be an indication of alcohol in the blood. Fortunately, while the legislature is free to manipulate the law, they are limited in their ability to manipulate science!

E. Linearity Problems. By it’s very nature, infrared spectrophotometry will have problems with linear validity. In other words, the machine will not be as accurate at extremely low blood alcohol levels as it might be as one approaches the legal limit of .10%. This problem is illustrated by the fact that Arizona Department of Health Services regulations allow for a measurable volume (.01 grams) of alcohol to be detected in a subject known to be alcohol free!

F. Radio frequency interference. Radio Frequency Interference or "R.F.I." can result in inaccurate readings. While the Intoxilyzer 5000 purports to have an "R.F.I. Detector" that will void a test subject to radio frequency interference, these detectors are not tested and calibrated at commonly used frequencies nor are they tested on varying horizontal and vertical planes.
G. Testing during the absorptive phase. This is a corollary of the rising alcohol defense. Alcohol can not effect or impair a person until it reaches the central nervous system -- the brain. Alcohol can not begin the process of reaching the brain until it is absorbed into the bloodstream. The blood, breath or urine test will be unreliable if done while you are still actively absorbing alcohol (it takes 45 minutes to three hours to complete absorption; this can be delayed if food is present in the stomach). Thus, alcohol consumed within forty-five minutes before driving might be reflected in a BAC test performed an hour or so after driving is concluded. But, those "last drinks" could not have effected your driving because they were unabsorbed at the time of driving.

H. Retrograde extrapolation. This refers to the requirement that the BAC be "related back" in time from the time of the test to the time of driving and relates to the absorptive phase/rising alcohol defense referred to in 19(6)(G) above. Again, a number of complex physiological problems are involved here including gender, body weight, what alcoholic beverages were consumed and when.
7. Regulation of blood-alcohol testing. The prosecution must prove that the blood, breath or urine test complied with state requirements as to calibration, maintenance, etc., and was in proper operating condition at the time of the test. Through the proper use of discovery, the defense can often unearth "foundational" deficiencies with respect to the state’s chemical evidence. What doesn’t get into evidence can’t hurt you at trial.

8. License suspension hearings. A number of issues can be raised in the context of an administrative hearing before the state's department of motor vehicles. Most importantly, given the limitations imposed on a defendant’s right to engage in pre-trial discovery, the D.M.V. hearing is an excellent discovery tool and allows the defendant an opportunity to commit state witnesses to a "story" under oath.
However, from a practical standpoint, a defendant ("Petitioner" in the administrative proceeding) will almost invariably lose at the D.M.V. hearing.

There are many reasons for this: The same Administrative Law Judge sits as both judge and prosecutor -- his or her inclination is to always uphold the suspension/revocation of your license.

Furthermore, a D.M.V. hearing is a civil, rather than a criminal, proceeding. Accordingly, the procedural safeguards inherent in a criminal proceeding (e.g., burden of proof, ability to "retro" test results, reliance on the inherent margin of error, etc.) are unavailable in a D.M.V. hearing. Nonetheless, D.M.V. hearing should be insisted upon because they are valuable discovery tools.

What is "mouth alcohol"?

What is "mouth alcohol"?

"Mouth alcohol" refers to the existence of any alcohol in the mouth or esophagus. If this is present during a breath test, then the results will be falsely high.

This is because the breath machine assumes that the breath is from the alveolar region of the lungs. For complex physiological reasons, its internal computer multiplies the amount of alcohol by 2100. This multiplier is known as the "partition ratio." Thus, even a tiny amount of alcohol breathed directly into the machine from the mouth or throat can have a huge impact.

Mouth alcohol can be caused in many ways. Belching, burping, hiccuping or vomiting within 20 minutes of taking the test can bring vapor from alcoholic beverages still in the stomach up into the mouth and throat. Taking a breath freshener can send a machine's reading way up (such products as Binaca and Listerine have alcohol in them); cough syrups and other products also contain alcohol. Dental bridges and dental caps can trap alcohol. Blood in the mouth from an injury is yet another source of inaccurate breath test results.

The Intoxilyzer 5000, the most commonly used evidential breath testing device in Arizona, has a "slope detector." The purpose of this slope detector is to detect mouth alcohol and abort the test sequence. The slope detector is never tested or calibrated on drinking subjects. It is well known by both defense attorneys as well as state criminalists that the slope detector can be "fooled" by a drinking subject.

What is a sentence "enhancement"?

What is a sentence "enhancement"?

Arizona, like most states, increase the punishment in drunk driving cases if certain facts exist. The most common of these is an earlier conviction for the same or a similar offense -- usually within five years of the current offense. Other commonly encountered enhancements (which must usually be alleged in the complaint) include:
1. A child was in the car at the time.
2. There was property damage or injury. 
3. The blood-alcohol concentration was over .15%.
The Arizona courts have held that an automobile is a dangerous instrumentality. Accordingly, it is not uncommon for the state to charge an aggravated assault or manslaughter when an DUI involves an accident or injury.

What is the punishment for drunk driving?

What is the punishment for drunk driving?


As noted above, a conviction for a first offense will involve some jail time, a fine, a license suspension or restriction, attendance at a DUI education course for a period of time, and probation for 1-5 years. Additional jail time and more substantial fines will be required for subsequent convictions. Additional punishment may involve community service, ignition interlock devices and/or impounding of the vehicle.


What will it cost to get a lawyer?

What will it cost to get a lawyer?

This varies, of course, by the reputation and experience of the lawyer and by the geographic location. As with doctors, generally, the more skilled the attorney and the larger the city, the higher the fee. A related factor is the amount of time a lawyer devotes to his cases: the better lawyers take fewer clients, spending more hours on each.
The range of fees is huge. A general practitioner in a small community may charge only $300; a DUI practitioner with a national reputation may charge up to $10,000 or more, depending on the facts. In addition, the fee may vary by such other factors as:
1. Is the offense a misdemeanor or felony?
2. If prior convictions are alleged, the procedures for attacking them may add to the cost.
3. The fee may or may not include trial or appeals.
4. Administrative license suspension procedures may also be extra.
5. The lawyer may charge a fixed fee, or he may ask for a retainer in advance -- to be applied against hourly charges.
6. Costs such as witness fees, independent blood analysis, service of subpoenas, etc., may be extra.
Whatever the fee quoted, you should ask for a written agreement and make sure you understand all the terms.


How can I find a qualified drunk driving lawyer?

How can I find a qualified drunk driving lawyer?

The best way to find a good DUI/DWI lawyer is by reputation. There are a few attorneys who have national reputations; these, of course, are expensive. Thus, the best approach is to ask other attorneys in the jurisdiction: Who is the best in the area? If you do not know any attorneys, go to the local courthouse and ask people like bailiffs, clerks and public defenders: Who would THEY go to if arrested for drunk driving?
An excellent indication of quality and experience is membership in the National College for DUI Defense.  The National College provides the best advanced-level training to the DUI practitioner.

National College for DUI Defense (NCDD)
Ms. Rhea Kirk
Executive Director
445 S Decatur
Montgomery AL 36104
Tel: 334-264-1950
Fax: 334-264-1920
rhea@ncdd.com
When you meet with the attorney, make sure of three things:
1.They have extensive experience in DUI/DWI litigation.
2. They have a reputation for going to trial in appropriate cases, rather than just "pleading out" their clients.
3.The financial terms of representation are clear and documented.
Some DUI arrestees consider hiring an ex-cop or an ex-prosecutor to represent them. Many attorneys start off their legal careers working for the government to gain experience. Those who stay with a prosecutorial agency
for more that a year or two often do so because they believe they cannot succeed in the competitive world of private practice. You must ask yourself, "Why did this person initially seek to put people like me behind bars?"  Some
attorneys make the ex-cop or ex-prosecutor angle a major selling point in their marketing efforts. If prior governmental service appears to be the attorney's number one claim to fame, consider your choice very carefully. The Law Office of Kathleen N. Carey Law Offices, PLC EMPLOYS NO FORMER COPS AND NO FORMER PROSECUTORS. Cops and prosecutors are not our friends and they are not your friends.
 http://www.azduiatty.com/arizona-dui-questions.htm

Can I represent myself? What can a lawyer do for me?

Can I represent myself? What can a lawyer do for me?

You can represent yourself -- although it is not a good idea. "Drunk driving" is a very complex field with increasingly harsh consequences. There is a minefield of complicated scientific, procedural, evidentiary, constitutional, sentencing and administrative license issues.

What can a lawyer do? Nothing (or worse) if he is not qualified in this field -- no more than a family doctor could help with brain surgery. A qualified attorney, however, can review the case for defects, move to suppress evidence, compel discovery of such things as calibration and maintenance records for the breath machine, have blood samples independently analyzed, negotiate for a lesser charge or reduced sentence, obtain expert witnesses for trial, contest the administrative license suspension, etc.

The officer took my license and served me with a notice of suspension after the breath test. How can he do that if I'm presumed innocent?

The officer took my license and served me with a notice of suspension after the breath test. How can he do that if I'm presumed innocent?


Agreed, it is blatantly unfair. But Arizona’s "Implied Consent/Admin Per Se" statute provides for immediate suspension and confiscation of the license if the breath test result is above the legal limit (or, in the case of a blood or urine test, if the officer reasonably believes the result will be above the limit).

It is essential to understand that a DUI involves two independent and unrelated proceedings: Criminal proceedings on the DUI charge(s) and an administrative proceeding before the Department of Motor Vehicles against your driving privileges. Therefore, it essential for you--or your attorney--to request a D.M.V. hearing within 15 days of your arrest. The effect of such a request is to "stay," or postpone your administrative suspension until the matter can be heard by an Administrative Law Judge.


 

Followers

Total Pageviews